How Does Technology Influence the Google Generation

Nowadays, with the advancement of applied science, our current generation, the question centripetal Google generation, is being influenced in a ban route. So what is the actual meaning of Google generation? oneness of the common definitions is that The Google generation is a popular verbiage that refers to a generation of early days great deal, born later on 1993, growing up in a existence dominated by the Internet (Rowlands et al. 292). However, that definition is non definitely precise. Jim Ashling says, Everyone is members of the Google generation. All age groups exhibit well-nigh Google-generation traits (22).Thus, the Google generation encompasses not only the boy worry, but all overly the new(prenominal) generations. Which one wee-wees the Google generation? The answer is applied science. Since it is inbred in every argona of life, the Google generation is impacted by it, which consists of changing their behaviors, affecting their critical believeing, sway ing their discipline employment, and making the children digital-age. The internet is currently considered an integral character reference of the society. It provides both advantages and disadvantages. For one thing, the cultivation literacy of young good deal has not been advanced with the widening access to applied science (Rowlands et al. 95).Further, Internet re anticipate shows that the speed of young peoples weathervane searching means that superficial eon is spent in evaluating nurture, either for relevance, accuracy or strength (Rowlands et al. 295). This will make them more work-shy. In addition, young people cook a poor savvy of their information needs and thus find it awkward to develop effective search strategies (Rowlands et al. 295). As a result, they exhibit a strong preference for expressing themselves in natural language rather than analyzing which key speech might be more effective (Rowlands et al. 295).Moreover, young people stick unsophisticate d mental maps of what the internet is, often failing to appreciate that it is a accrual of networked resources from different providers (Rowlands et al. 296). Consequently, the search engine, Yahoo or Google, becomes the principal(a) brands that they associate with the internet (Rowlands et al. 296). in that respectfore, their ability of evaluating and searching information will princip everyy count on the search tools, and their creativity will be restricted. In the other words, it screw be considered a type of unlifelike literacy. When they receive information of a specific topic, they think that they understand it.However, no one recognizes that information is extracted from technology, peculiarly the internet, not from their authentic perceptions. Critical thinking as an attitude is embedded in Western culture. There is a belief that argument is the way to purpose truth, observes Adrian West, research director at the Edward de Bono Foundation U. K. , and a former computer science lecturer at the University of Manchester (Greengard 18). Thereby, critical thinking is very crucial in speculating the information. If one loses that ability, he cannot perceive the entity of issues.Unfortunately, currently fast development of technology causes their thinking process to be passive. They atomic number 18 not able to think the way which was formerly. In contrast, their present thinking process may be called machinery sense. Greengard states about this issue Although there is little debate that computer technology complements and often enhances the merciful mind in the quest to store information and process an ever-growing tangle of bits and bytes, there is increasing colligate that the same technology is changing the way we get on complex problems and conundrums, and making it more difficult to rattling think (18).Additionally, the wealth of communications and information can easily overwhelm our rea discussioning abilities (Greengard 18). agreely, B ugeja concludes Without critical thinking, we create trivia (Greengard 19). Seriously, it is time to take a next and more serious look at technology and understand the subtleties of how it affects the thinking process. Whats more, their yarn habit is one of technologys considerable victims. According to the National Endowment for the Arts, literary reading declined 10 percentage signifys from 1982 to 2002 and the rate of decline is accelerating (Greengard 18).That is an authentically affright statistic. Along with a diversity of information on the internet, their reading habit has been lessened drastically. The reason is that previously, people only collected information through controls, which are the chief source. They regularly read close to all pages of a book. Notwithstanding, the technology distraction level is accelerating to the point where thinking deeply is difficult (Greengard 18). They are overwhelmed by a constant barrage of devices and tasks, and increasingly sc ram from the Google syndrome (Greengard 18).People accept what they read and believe what they bring in online is fact when it is not (Greengard 18). Nicholas Carr, a journalist, told that it used to be easy to immerse himself in a book or a lengthy article. Nonetheless, the lolly disconcert his concentration on reading. He has to struggle against his reading habit that used to come naturally. For more than a decade now, he has been spending most of time online, searching, and surfing on the internet.As a result, the Net seems to chip away his capacity for concentration and contemplation. It is not only Nicholass problem, but is ours as well. The authors of the break down report say It is clear that users are not reading online in the traditional sense indeed there are signs that new forms of reading are emerging as users power browse horizontally through titles, contents pages and abstracts going for quick wins. It almost seems that they go online to avoid reading in the tradi tional sense. (Carr, par. )Also, he supposes that the Google generation comes to rely on computers to negociate their understanding of the world it is their own intelligence that flattens into kitschy intelligence (Carr, par. 36). At any rate, they are able to absorb the benefits of reading through the internet and persevere the traditional habits because reading is learning and entertaining. The most large example of the Google generation is the digital-age kids (OBrien, par. 1). Why are they called digital-age? OBrien has a 15-year-old son whose study is completely deflect by the technology.She had to keep a deep warmness on him whenever he took an exam. She says Every time I crossed the threshold, the scene was the same textbooks remained firmly close in his bag while the laptop was open on his desk. On the screen was about account statement/ physics/English document, but also his Facebook and iTunes pages. In his ears were the iPod plugs, playing back a podcast. And som etimes, just to let on his concentration even further, he might have had a half-played video running on YouTube as well (OBrien, par. 3 and 4). She was irritated to keep his son on concentrating.From her problem, she concludes Hes a digital native youre a digital immigrant (OBrien, par. 6). digital natives and digital immigrants are terms named by the American futurist, Marc Prensky, to distinguish between those who have grown up with technology and those who have varyed to it (OBrien, par. 7). According to researchers, the children are in the midst of a sea shift in the way that they read and think (OBrien, par. 8). They have wonderfully flexible minds. Further, they absorb information quickly, adapt to changes and are adept at culling from multiple sources. just now they are also suffering from internet-induced attention deficit disorder (OBrien, par. 8). Rose Luckin, Professor of Learner- Centred Design at the London Knowledge Lab and a see professor at the University of Sus sex, is working on a study examining the internets impact on pupils critical and meta-cognitive skills. The bedevilment view coming through is that students are wanting in reflective awareness, she says. Technology makes it easy for them to collate information, but not to analyze and understand it (OBrien, par. ). In short, it is time the society should do something to improve the digital-age children. Therefore, the intention of parents and teachers are constantly respected and highly valued, like Rose Luckin says Because they have been using digital technology all their lives, our children feel they have authority over it.But technology cannot teach them to reflect upon and quantify the information they are gathering online. For that, the role of teachers and parents stiff fundamentally important. (OBrien, par. 2) Even though technology brings more various utilities to the civilization of the society, there are some issues on which are scouted out seriously. The Google gener ation ought to be aware of how to harness it. Do not let it affect the behavior, the ability of thinking critically, reading habit, and digital-age children. At any events, they should utilize the best benefits of technology to improve the life in a proper way. agree in mind that technology can be a good servant, but it can be also a bad boss.